Kenyan Pundit

September 22nd, 2006

DCI Blogging Indaba - some (final?) thoughts

DCI panel

Apart from a few smart-ass remarks on my blog, I have largely avoided any commentary on the controversy (and rather stimulating debate) surrounding Blogging Indaba.
Why is this? Because like I said before, I have little time for polemics (let alone time to regularly blog anymore) and I’d rather focus my energy on changing situations that I am irked about (to the extent that I can) rather than ranting on the internets.

That being said, the debate was welcome and while I think that some of the commentary was way overboard in terms of paranoia over an African blogosphere take-over-by-whitey, I will never question the right to question…hell, Mzalendo was born out of the very idea that individuals should question their government. Furthermore, isn’t that what blogging is all about…at it’s very core…individual expression….whether you are writing about your socks, hard fucks (KM where are you?) or the implications of the Kengen IPO.

An aside: I find it very interesting that the very same people who were arguing that blogging remains a very personal domain that should not be subject to any code, indaba, elite project, do-gooder goals etc., were disappointed that the Kenyan bloggers in
attendance “sided with their benefactors, engaged in a little self-depreciating humour or remained silent.” And, are now asking us to disseminate lessons learned etc.. Made me wonder…what if, in exercising my ability to blog what I want to blog about, I chose to say absolutely nothing about the blogging indaba? So what if Mental blogged only about toilets? How does this fit in with the virulent reactions about the idea against message dissemination from forums like the indaba? MMK wrote, quite eloquently, “A central goal of these kinds of meetings is to move ideas and knowledge out of their tacit forms – where they are owned by individuals and received by individuals - to codified forms. Not for the benefit of the blogger but rather to profit the administrator who enables and ‘owns’ the codifying space. Knowledge when it is codified is made into a standardized message that is precious in the marketplace, far more in many instances that its tacit counterpart.” Can we recognize that whether we like it or not, ideals about blogging, some mainstreaming etc will be inevitable (and get over it, blogging is a very elitist activity…talk of how what we are engaged in will impact the masses is spurious at best..from what I can tell, we the African elite barely have our act together)? Halafu/afterall, what is KBW if not some legitimizing tool? Fortunately, while I’m still trying to wrap my head around this, Marazzmatazz has done a superb job of stepping up and sharing the nuggets of wisdom that he gained at the conference.

My, that was a digression wasn’t it.

Like I said earlier, I did have great ambitions of doing a blow-by-blow summary of events/panels during the indaba, but this never happened for several reasons mainly related to the fact that I was in attendance as a speaker and was putting together my presentation/workshop up until the very last meeting, and had several meetings related to Mzalendo during some of the panels, and I’m currently I’m doing the closing paperwork/contracts for two deals at work worth several million rands and only got to spend a week in Grahamstown in exchange for my promising my boss rapid response to any emails that require my attention. Unfortunately, some of the panels that I did manage to catch focused on what I felt were peripheral issues e.g. describing Web 2.0 - something that was helpful to absolutely no one in attendance. So, instead of giving a granular perspective of what I think were important ideas the came out of the conference (for those who are looking for that, please see the wiki and Marazzmatazz if you haven’t already), I’ll do my best to give a larger picture view.

That, ladies and gentlemen inaitwa disclaimer.

Haiya…what was accomplished by the indaba?

1. An interesting two weeks on the African blogosphere. Debate is good…now let’s take this somewhere concrete.

2. Sokari wonders”How is this going to encourage people who know nothing about the possbilities of blogging or who dont have access to technology - how is it going to help them?” In my view the Indaba certainly will not help people who don’t have access to technology…in fact one of the challenges posed at the conference was to move away from all this talk about Web 2.0 in a vaccum and start thinking about how Web 2.0 tools can be used in conjunction with other tools to reach those without access e.g. merging the ability of those of with access to create individual content via podcasts with traditional forms of media which remain critical in Africa e.g. radio. Instead of sitting around and complaining about how white male software developers are not developing tools for countries without widespread access (why should they I wonder?), lets challenge African developers to develop tools that are relevant to the African context (have I said this enough times, lets stop whining!). I do think it did encourage others to think about possibilities of blogging, at least that’s the feedback I got after my talk on Mzalendo, which is built on a blogging platform. The idea that all these new tools are a means to an end rather than an end in themselves was something that I think was effectively communicated by the end of the conference (though it didn’t start out that way). I talked to a number of attendees, mainly journalists from other countries, who were learning about blogging tools for the first time and were interested in using blogs particularly to circumvent the influence of corruption when it comes to editorial decisions at major newspapers, and to a number of people who worked in civil society organizations who wanted to learn how to use blogs to boost their online presence….so yes, I think attendees were introduced to new possibilities.

3. Alaa’s talk on the role of blogs and other forms of technology like email and SMS and amplifying the voice of activists and encouraging people to almost fall into more mainstream forms of activism e.g. street protests was powerful - again reinforcing the theme of not obsessing about blogs and other tools as ends in themselves. What I like the most about his presentation, which came right after mine, was that it represented an excellent example of an idea a coined during my presentation - micro-activism - the idea that while technology won’t be facilitating political revolutions in Africa any time soon, it is a great way to give voice to the individual, usually at no cost, and that small step can often lead to bigger possibilities whether it is gaining self-confidence or becoming the go-to resource for financial reporting.

4. From the DCI programme, “Our other goal is to provide a networking platform for fellow Africans that will hopefully promote further collaboration on the continent and build a strong, active online community.” I think networking did happen and I suspect their will be collaboration taking place e.g. Alaa wants to discuss replicating Mzalendo in Egypt, but it’s impact will be limited by the fact that the audience itself was limited.

5. Andrew Heavens’ photo blogging workshop was very popular. More than the straight up blogging workshop - suggesting that people aren’t interested in tools (anyone can set up a blogger account), but interesting ways to use tools. OK, this wasn’t an accomplishment, just an observation.


What was not accomplished?

1. The fact that the indaba piggy-backed on Highway Africa (focused on journalism) and the location of the conference limited it’s ability to reach a wider audience and meant that we spent an unneccesary amount of time on the bloggers vs. journalists debate and on justifying blogging rather than on sharing practical lessons.

2. I’m repeating myself a bit but some of the panels had little relevance to the state goals of the indaba e.g. the civil society one and the we media one, I don’t think the conference organizers had a true sense of how diverse the African blogosphere is and they generally did a poor job of putting together a series of panels that truly demonstrate the possibilities of blogging. I would much rather have listened to Ndesanjo speak about building a Swahili blogosphere etc. Side note: I agree with White African here that the content of the conference is much more powerful than the fact that everyone there looks like you…most of the ideas that have inspired me the most have been cribbed from conferences where I was one of two black people in attendance, but one shouldn’t assume that networking isn’t a challenge is such situations…it is.

What next?

I’m with Mental on this. Take all the energy spurred by the debate and work on putting together a conference that is more representative and relevant. Prior to the blogging indaba, the only other person that I’d heard speak about an African blogging conference and who I know tried to do some background work on putting one together was Ethan Zuckerman (another white male for those who are keeping score).

It will be interesting to see whether this idea grows legs though…when we started Mzalendo, one of things we counted on was strong support and assistance from KBW especially with the idea of blogging from Parliament, after all KBW had no shortage of a cacophony of voices of people who were disgusted with our MPs (some of Thinker’s most popular posts are those that diss MPs)…apart from a few individuals who stepped up (less than 10, I think) Mzalendo never became the the blogger activism vehicle we thought it would…instead most of the people who have been critical in getting us good data, pointing out errors, spreading the word, etc. are people who’ve generally never even heard about blogs or read a blog and in some cases have little to do with Kenya…funny how that turned out.

OK, time for dinner.

Popularity: 19% [?]

April 4th, 2006

Bit of gossip

Rumor has it: Bank involved in this story is Victoria Bank and this company “Among the accounts examined is one belonging to a company that had evaded Value Added Tax to the tune of Sh247 million while no opening forms were found for an individual’s account with a turnover of Sh2.186 billion” is Nakumatt. Sources suggest that this is definitely why Mullei went down…Kenyan politics dirty as ever.

Update: I thought the reason that Nation (and most people who know the details of the story) are being cautious is because of Harun Mwau’s role, but I guess that is no longer a concern. Hat tip Bankelele! Harun Mwau has a history of filing (and winning) huge defamation lawsuits and he is considered pretty much untouchable in the country because of his deep pockets/connections and because many, many, many, people have been on his gravy train for a while. According to the grapevine, Nakumatt has been laundering his money for ages.

AOB: What’s exciting Kenyans = this , what’s making us yawn = this, this, this, this, this etc. Who isn’t running for president? Can’t ODM just disband now? Besides I think Kibaki has demonstrated that the country can run on auto pilot.

Popularity: 9% [?]

March 15th, 2006

Kenyans foiled again

(although their love for political gossip and “siasa” makes them abettors).

That the government can go to great (shoddy) lengths to orchestrate the mercenary press conference saga may suggest that they are well attuned to Kenyans’ infamous political amnesia.

Or am I giving them too much credit?

Anglo-leasing? Goldenberg arrests? Moody resigning? Constitution? Standard raid?

What??? That was so two weeks ago.

Meanwhile ODM has the same predeliction for stupid drama while the country falls apart. I mean have these MEN put anything on the table other their raw ambition?

So on and on we’ll go until 2007.

And Kenyans will be right there with them ready to gobble up all their antics (while complaining about how terrible politicians are).

How many times have you heard people say that they miss Moi because at least he was entertaining (folks who spent nightmarish times at Nyayo house will disagree…the amnesia problem again)?

And the elections will be upon us.

And we’ll spend another five years complaining about how nothing has changed.

Popularity: 8% [?]

January 16th, 2006

Blog = poor (wo)man’s printing press

That’s why I’m posting this here, because the Nation wouldn’t publish it back in November for some reason (and because I’m a bit swamped right now and can’t do the still elusive “real” post).

First read this op-ed(from someone who should really know better, I think). [EDIT: link has been fixed and the author is a former Nation editor in chief and UN PR rep).

Here’s my response, which apparently didn’t meet the editor’s muster…

To equate the campaign being conducted by the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) against misuse of public resources by government officials to “stalking a mandazi thief” as Peter Mwaura recently did (Daily Nation, November 12, 2005) suggests, at best, a facile understanding of the National Commission’s work and approach and downplays the serious implications of government misuse of public resources. Perhaps the Commission’s approach would have been more comprehensible had Mr. Mwaura attempted to first contact the Commission and clarify what the campaign is all about, rather imply that the Commissioners “are busybodies who have nothing better to do.”

There are several things that Mr. Mwaura got wrong in his critique of the Commission’s campaign. First, in pursuing its campaign against government misuse of public resources, the Commission is indeed sticking to “its core mandate of furthering the protection and promotion of human rights….” Under the International Convention of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), our government is committed to taking steps to achieve the realization of social, cultural and economic rights using the maximum resources available to it. The diversion of public funds from their intended use is not just a violation of the law; it affects the government’s ability to deliver on services and in essence inhibits the realization of human rights – particularly social and economic rights such as the right to education, and the right to housing. Moreover, the Kenyan government is a signatory to the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which guarantees all persons equality before the law and the equal protection of the law. For far too long, our public officials have been unaccountable for their criminal misdeeds while in office, suggesting that there is a dual system of justice – one for ordinary mwananchi and one for those who are in public office - the KNCHR is committed to ensuring that all persons are treated equally before the law.

Second, the Commission is interested in both obtaining results and making a point. Kenya has long been bedeviled by unethical politicians whose “political crimes” have remained beyond reproach. The campaign against misuse of public resources signals a call for a new culture of accountability and ethics among Kenyan politicians. By suggesting that the misuse of government vehicles by our politicians is “petty corruption” or a “relatively minor infraction,” Mr. Mwaura perpetuates exactly the status quo that most Kenyans have expressed a desire to end - the continued willingness to let our politicians get away with all sorts of crimes and misdeeds. The fact that there is nothing “petty” about misusing using government cars for non-official use should be self-evident. However, for those who are unclear about this, some clarification may be in order.

As Mr. Mwaura himself notes, Section 15 the Public Officer Ethics Act, which was enacted specifically to stem the abuse of public office and as part of the government’s “total war on corruption,” forbids the use of public resources for private purposes by all public officials. Furthermore, the improper use of government vehicles was expressly forbidden in a circular issued on 18th December 2003, by the Head of the Civil Service, Francis Muthaura. According to the circular, “government transport facilities, including those of State Corporations and Local Authorities are for official use only.”

Third, the KNCHR is carrying out a targeted campaign and is not pursuing “all wrongs, real or imagined, everywhere” – the campaign is focused specifically on government cars that are being used for non-official purposes. Contrary to Mr. Mwaura’s accusations, the Commission is engaging in solutions that are proportional to the problem. These are not cases where personal benefit is being derived from official use, or where the personal use is “incidental” to official use unless Mr. Mwaura adheres to a previously unheard of definition of “incidental.” There is nothing incidental about a government Minister arriving at a campaign rally in his or her official car, since campaigning for or against the referendum is not government business (as the Vice-President himself recently reminded us). If a public official wishes to campaign, they should use their personal or party resources and not taxpayers’ money.

Finally, it is important to reemphasize that the Commission’s effort towards increasing accountability in our political leaders is part of a concerted effort to end the prevailing culture of impunity in Kenya that has resulted in the violation of various human rights. Politicians who do not operate in a transparent or accountable manner are unlikely to respect the human rights of the citizens once in power – you cannot have one without the other. Moreover, no one has a monopoly on ensuring that the government is transparent and accountable to its people; the fact that the Kenya Anti-Corruption Authority (KACA) exists does nothing to undermine the work that the KNCHR is doing and vice versa. By inculcating a respect for the rule of law and for accountability in government, and by involving the Kenyan public in our campaign through the setting up of hotlines, we are emphasizing two important pillars that ensure the protection and protecting human rights.

It is interesting, if not disappointing, to note that the very politicians who spent years vilifying the past regime for abuse of public office are now scampering to justify or excuse their illegal behavior; if they feel that they have not broken the law, let them defend themselves in court like the average accused Kenyan does. This kind of “petty corruption” that Mr. Mwaura refers to is precisely the kind of behavior that leads to “grand corruption” – maybe Mr. Mwaura should let us know where exactly we should draw the line. If working to ensure that taxpayers’ funds are put to proper use amounts to being “busybodies,” then I encourage Kenyans to help us keep busy.

Popularity: 14% [?]

November 24th, 2005

Kibaki wakes up…finally.

I’m sure you’ve all read about the sackings by now. I’m reading the political tea leaves like everyone else so I have nothing much to add to this. By the way, after recently moaning about poor standards of journalism in the major newspapers, I’m really feeling Macharia Gaitho, his analysis on the Cabinet sackings is spot on. Big debate now is whether he’ll start with a clean slate or whether some reviled characters (Murungi and Murungaru heading the list) will make it back. Wako’s position is apparently next. If I was the ‘baks I’d start by trimming the Cabinet drastically to less about 11 positions (fewer bozos to worry about). Of course, nothing else will dominate conversations in Nairobi for the next two weeks…and as much as we’d all like to move on, get set for non-stop politiking until 2007.

An aside: the Orange side is already getting delusional, I think this was a vote against the Wako draft and the government etc. but not exactly a mandate for the Orange team to “head” the review process…if they start getting to carried away, they will meet the electorate’s wrath, just like everybody else. And then…I’m also very perturbed by the glaring absence of women on the Orange team (Kilimo aside and she didn’t even feature in KICC the other day). If Yes, signified the old boys network, Orange is nothing more than the boys network. Why does this worry me? For more than just reasons of representation…it is a fact that some members on the Orange team campaigned strongly against Wako on the basis that women will be allowed to “take all the land” and other inaccuracies that do not augur well for the role of women in Kenya and in Kenyan politics, still to early to make a call but I hope my concerns are unwarranted.

I’m back on the road tomorrow for the next few weeks…still not over the travel bug that bit me after I left the U.S. Blog updates might be spotty over the next few days.

Popularity: 13% [?]

Next Page »