<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constitutional Referendum Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kenyanpundit.com/2005/10/12/constitutional-referendum-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kenyanpundit.com/2005/10/12/constitutional-referendum-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Opinions, commentary, na kadhalika</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kenyanpundit.com/2005/10/12/constitutional-referendum-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-80032</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 05:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenyanpundit.com/?p=42#comment-80032</guid>
		<description>Why do we have this war on majimbo? It seems like the proponents of this type of governance are confused about the type of majimbo they are telling kenya they want to implement. on the other hand the opposers of the system seems to have a preconditioned type of majimbo they are using to scare kenyans from it.
I think the pronents should educate kenyans on this type of governance and stop assuming they dont have a misconception of the the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we have this war on majimbo? It seems like the proponents of this type of governance are confused about the type of majimbo they are telling kenya they want to implement. on the other hand the opposers of the system seems to have a preconditioned type of majimbo they are using to scare kenyans from it.<br />
I think the pronents should educate kenyans on this type of governance and stop assuming they dont have a misconception of the the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judith</title>
		<link>http://www.kenyanpundit.com/2005/10/12/constitutional-referendum-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4563</link>
		<dc:creator>judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenyanpundit.com/?p=42#comment-4563</guid>
		<description>Very gooood project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very gooood project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Kenya: Constitutional referendum</title>
		<link>http://www.kenyanpundit.com/2005/10/12/constitutional-referendum-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Kenya: Constitutional referendum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenyanpundit.com/?p=42#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] 56 EDT 			 		Sub-Saharan Africa Kenya			Global Roundups 					 									Kenyan Pundit posts more notes from a recent open forum on the country&#8217;s forthcoming constitutional referendum.   			 			Luis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 56 EDT 			 		Sub-Saharan Africa Kenya			Global Roundups 					 									Kenyan Pundit posts more notes from a recent open forum on the country&#8217;s forthcoming constitutional referendum.   			 			Luis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InSidious</title>
		<link>http://www.kenyanpundit.com/2005/10/12/constitutional-referendum-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>InSidious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenyanpundit.com/?p=42#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Just to point out; I was looking forward to your dissertation, part II like a kid in a candy shop.:oops: 

You infer to the very core of this struggle that has been lost in a myriad of obscure sycophant hallucinations in support of the divergent. Indeed the streets became battle scenes for a number of reason but principal being the power of the Executive. The Bomas draft does reflect and capture the context of our displeasure and therefore a drive for change.

Furthermore, the bill of rights, perhaps the only bright spot in this darkness was somewhat watered down by the Wako draft. For instance Chapter 6, section 43 (disability act) plays high and mighty. Outrageously, the government is not obliged to ensure that these guidelines are entrenched into the mainstream. This is what I mean. A building does not have to accommodate accessible amenities that will allow a person(s) with disability to access it without seemingly ‘shutting them out’ by construction obstacles. The government will not prosecute such an owner for discrimination; Period.

On social security, section 60; it is not mandatory for the government to hand out welfare for the least fortunate yet it is their right to welfare. Such conflicting language or intent for that mater is insincere and goes way against what the Bomas draft intended. As we can attest, our legislators seem oblivious even to this basic need. 

That said; where do we go from here? I know what majority of my kin folk will do; we’ll shove it down their throats. We’ve waited 40 plus years, by no means is it tough to wait a few more for a proper document. 

My intent was to be brief. My apologies Ory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to point out; I was looking forward to your dissertation, part II like a kid in a candy shop.:oops: </p>
<p>You infer to the very core of this struggle that has been lost in a myriad of obscure sycophant hallucinations in support of the divergent. Indeed the streets became battle scenes for a number of reason but principal being the power of the Executive. The Bomas draft does reflect and capture the context of our displeasure and therefore a drive for change.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the bill of rights, perhaps the only bright spot in this darkness was somewhat watered down by the Wako draft. For instance Chapter 6, section 43 (disability act) plays high and mighty. Outrageously, the government is not obliged to ensure that these guidelines are entrenched into the mainstream. This is what I mean. A building does not have to accommodate accessible amenities that will allow a person(s) with disability to access it without seemingly ‘shutting them out’ by construction obstacles. The government will not prosecute such an owner for discrimination; Period.</p>
<p>On social security, section 60; it is not mandatory for the government to hand out welfare for the least fortunate yet it is their right to welfare. Such conflicting language or intent for that mater is insincere and goes way against what the Bomas draft intended. As we can attest, our legislators seem oblivious even to this basic need. </p>
<p>That said; where do we go from here? I know what majority of my kin folk will do; we’ll shove it down their throats. We’ve waited 40 plus years, by no means is it tough to wait a few more for a proper document. </p>
<p>My intent was to be brief. My apologies Ory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

